4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A case study of aerosol impacts on summer convective clouds and precipitation over northern China

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 142-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.006

Keywords

Aerosol impact; Summer convective precipitation; MODIS; Model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emissions such as greenhouse gases, precursor gases and particulate matters may directly alter the Earth radiative budget or indirectly modify cloud and precipitation processes, and possibly induce changes in climate and the hydrological cycle at the regional to global scale. The previous publications reported a few quantitative assessments and inconsistent results on the effects of the emissions on cloud and precipitation. The aerosol properties and possible impacts on a convective precipitation case on 4 July 2008 over the urban region of northern China are investigated based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data and the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model coupled with Chemistry (WRF- Chem). Results show that the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) is over 0.9 in the study area, indicating a high concentration of aerosol pollution. The value of Angstrom exponent in the study area is larger than 1.0, indicating that the main particles in the area are industrial and biomass burning pollution aerosols with radii less than 0.25-0.5 mu m. The modeling results show that the domain-averaged precipitation amount under polluted conditions can be increased up to 17% during the whole cloud lifetime. However, the maximum rainfall rate above 30 mm/h is enhanced, whereas that below 30 mm/h is suppressed in most cloud lifetime. The differences of cloud microphysics and dynamics between polluted and clean conditions indicate that both warm and ice microphysics and updraft are suppressed at the storm's initial and dissipating stages, whereas those at the storm's mature stage are obviously enhanced under polluted conditions. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available