4.7 Article

Determinations of Sb and Mo in Cairo's dust using high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and direct solid sample analysis

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 18-24

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.049

Keywords

Air pollution; Sb; Mo; Direct solid sample analysis; High-resolution continuum source graphite; furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico and Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoalde Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Third World Academy of Science (TWAS) Trieste, Italy
  4. TWAS/CNPq
  5. CNPq
  6. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work describes the determination of Sb and Mo in dust deposited on tree leaves using direct solid sample analysis. Nineteen air particulate samples were collected from different districts of Cairo and surrounding cities. Since some samples have been taken from places less exposed to the pollution factors, the present study allows the comparison of air quality between high and low polluted areas. High-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry has been investigated, using direct solid sample analysis. The optimum pyrolysis and atomization temperatures for 5b were found to be 800 degrees C and 1900 degrees C, and 1200 degrees C and 2650 degrees C, respectively for Mo. The limits of detection and quantification for both, Sb and Mo, were 15 mu g g(-1) and 50 ng g(-1), respectively. The characteristic mass at was found to be m(0) = 38 pg for Sb (217.582 nm) and m(0) = 28 pg for Mo (313.259 nm). The results obtained for three certified reference materials of urban particulate matter confirmed the validity of the investigated method. The content of Sb varied between 213 +/- 1.3 mu g g(-1) and 1117 +/- 230 mu g g-1 with an average of 667 +/- 339 mu g g(-1). On the other hand, the Mo content varied from 113 +/- 2.3 mu g g(-1) to 361 +/- 51 mu g g(-1) and its average value equals 190 +/- 62 mu g g(-1). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available