4.7 Article

Atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) over a coastal/rural site downwind of East China: Temporal variation and long-range transport

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 45, Issue 15, Pages 2480-2487

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.043

Keywords

Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM); Temporal variation; Seasonal/diurnal variation; Long-range transport (LRT); Yellow Sea; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40803033, 41073092]
  2. KIST-CAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although much attention has been paid to the mercury pollution in China, limited field studies have been conducted to explore the atmospheric behavior of mercury. To investigate the temporal variation and long-range transport of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (GEM or Hg(0)), the GEM measurements covering four different seasons were performed at a coastal/rural site of the Yellow Sea downwind of East China. Hourly mean concentrations of GEM measured by RA-915+ mercury analyzer over the entire study (four different time periods between July 2007 and May 2009) were 2.31 +/- 0.74 ng m(-3) with a range of 1.12-7.01 ng m(-3). The results showed moderate seasonal variations with high levels in cold seasons (winter: 2.53 +/- 0.77 ng m(-3) and spring: 2.34 +/- 0.54 ng m(-3)) and low levels in warm seasons (summer: 2.28 +/- 0.82 ng m(-3) and fall: 2.16 +/- 0.84 ng m(-3)). Over the each campaign a diurnal variation of GEM was observed consistently with peak levels in daytime and low levels in late night and early morning. The pollution rose and NOAA-HYSPLIT back-trajectory model analyses indicated that the elevated GEM was transported to the sampling site from the regional sources of East China and Korea peninsula-Japan. Air masses originated from the East China Sea and the regions of Continental East Asia with low emission strengths of atmospheric mercury (e.g., the east Russia, the north Inner Mongolia and the Bohai Sea) showed the decreased GEM levels. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available