4.5 Article

Achilles tendon strain energy in distance running: consider the muscle energy cost

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 2, Pages 193-199

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00732.2014

Keywords

Achilles; energy cost; tendon; running

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The return of tendon strain energy is thought to contribute to reducing the energy cost of running (E-run). However, this may not be consistent with the notion that increased Achilles tendon (AT) stiffness is associated with a lower Erun. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the potential for AT strain energy return relative to Erun for male and female runners of different abilities. A total of 46 long distance runners [18 elite male (EM), 12 trained male (TM), and 16 trained female (TF)] participated in this study. E-run was determined by indirect calorimetry at 75, 85, and 95% of the speed at lactate threshold (sLT), and energy cost per stride at each speed was estimated from previously reported stride length (SL)-speed relationships. AT force during running was estimated from reported vertical ground reaction force (Fz)-speed relationships, assuming an AT: ground reaction force moment arm ratio of 1.5. AT elongation was quantified during a maximal voluntary isometric contraction using ultrasound. Muscle energy cost was conservatively estimated on the basis of AT force and estimated crossbridge mechanics and energetics. Significant group differences existed in sLT (EM > TM > TF; P < 0.001). A significant group x speed interaction was found in the energy storage/release per stride (TM > TF > EM; P < 0.001), the latter ranging from 10 to 70 J/stride. At all speeds and in all groups, estimated muscle energy cost exceeded energy return (P < 0.001). These results show that during distance running the muscle energy cost is substantially higher than the strain energy release from the AT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available