4.6 Article

TOPOLOGY OF LUMINOUS RED GALAXIES FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 209, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/209/2/19

Keywords

cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of universe; methods: data analysis; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. Kyung Hee University [KHU-20100179]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea to the Center for Galaxy Evolution Research [2010-0027910]
  3. Sabbatical Leave Program of Kyung Hee University [KHU-20131724]
  4. Mid-Career Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  5. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea
  6. NRF to the Center for Galaxy Evolution Research [2010-0027910]
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  8. National Science Foundation
  9. US Department of Energy
  10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  11. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  12. Max Planck Society
  13. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  14. American Museum of Natural History
  15. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  16. University of Basel
  17. University of Cambridge
  18. Case Western Reserve University
  19. University of Chicago
  20. Drexel University
  21. Fermilab
  22. Institute for Advanced Study
  23. Japan Participation Group
  24. Johns Hopkins University
  25. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  26. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  27. Korean Scientist Group
  28. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory
  29. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  30. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  31. New Mexico State University
  32. Ohio State University
  33. University of Pittsburgh
  34. University of Portsmouth
  35. Princeton University
  36. US Naval Observatory
  37. University of Washington
  38. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013-00000005, 2010-0027910] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present measurements of the genus topology of luminous red galaxies (LRGs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 7 catalog, with unprecedented statistical significance. To estimate the uncertainties in the measured genus, we construct 81 mock SDSS LRG surveys along the past light cone from Horizon Run 3, one of the largest N-body simulations to date, which evolved 7210(3) particles in a 10,815 h(-1) Mpc box. After carefully modeling and removing all known systematic effects due to finite pixel size, survey boundary, radial and angular selection functions, shot noise, and galaxy biasing, we find that the observed genus amplitude reaches 272 at a 22 h(-1) Mpc smoothing scale, with an uncertainty of 4.2%; the estimated error fully incorporates cosmic variance. This is the most accurate constraint on the genus amplitude to date and significantly improves on our previous results. In particular, the shape of the genus curve agrees very well with the mean topology of the SDSS LRG mock surveys in a. cold dark matter universe. However, comparison with simulations also shows small deviations of the observed genus curve from the theoretical expectation for Gaussian initial conditions. While these discrepancies are mainly driven by known systematic effects such as shot noise and redshift-space distortions, they do contain important cosmological information on the physical effects connected with galaxy formation, gravitational evolution, and primordial non-Gaussianity. We address the key role played by systematics on the genus curve and show how to accurately correct for their effects to recover the topology of the underlying matter. A future work will provide an interpretation of these deviations in the context of the local model of non-Gaussianity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available