Journal
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 777, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L26
Keywords
cosmology: observations; dark matter; galaxies: distances and redshifts; large-scale structure of universe
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Observables such as the galaxy luminosity function, Phi(M), projected galaxy clustering, w(p)(r(p)), and the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, Delta Sigma(r(p)), are often measured from galaxy redshift surveys assuming a fiducial cosmological model for calculating distances to, and between galaxies. There are a growing number of studies that perform joint analyses of these measurements and constrain cosmological parameters. We quantify the amount by which such measurements systematically vary as the fiducial cosmology used for the measurements is changed, and show that these effects can be significant at high redshifts (z similar to 0.5). Cosmological analyses (or halo occupation distribution analyses) that use the luminosity function, clustering and the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal but ignore such systematic effects may bias the inference of the parameters. We present a simple way to account for the differences in the cosmological model used for the measurements and those used for the prediction of observables, thus allowing a fair comparison between models and data.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available