4.6 Article

SOLAR CYCLE ABUNDANCE VARIATIONS IN COROTATING INTERACTION REGIONS: EVIDENCE FOR A SUPRATHERMAL ION SEED POPULATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 748, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/2/L31

Keywords

acceleration of particles; interplanetary medium; solar wind; Sun: abundances

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX10AT75G (APL)]
  2. Caltech [44A-1088526 (APL)]
  3. NSF under SHINE [AGS-0962653 (APL), AGS-0962666 (SWRI), AGS-0962658 (UAH)]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0962658] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0962666, 0962653] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have surveyed the heavy ion composition of corotating interaction regions (CIRs) over the recent solar minimum and combined this with our earlier survey to cover the 1998-2011 period encompassing a full solar cycle and onset of the new cycle. We find that the solar minimum CIR intensities and spectral forms are similar to those in active periods, indicating that the basic acceleration mechanism does not vary with solar activity for energies below a few MeV nucleon(-1). However, the heavy ion abundances show a clear correlation with sunspot number, where heavy ions are more enhanced during active periods. Over the mass range He-Fe, the enhancement is organized by a power law in Q/M with exponent - 1.9, with Fe/O varying by a factor of similar to 6. During solar minimum CIR Fe/O was similar to 0.05, well below the corresponding solar wind ratio. Previous studies have shown that rare ions (He+, He-3) enhanced in CIRs come from the suprathermal ion pool. The observations presented here extend this evidence, indicating that in addition to rare He+ and He-3 the CIR major heavy ion species are accelerated out of the suprathermal ion pool, not the bulk solar wind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available