4.7 Article

DE-EXCITATION NUCLEAR GAMMA-RAY LINE EMISSION FROM LOW-ENERGY COSMIC RAYS IN THE INNER GALAXY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 763, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/98

Keywords

cosmic rays; gamma rays: ISM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent observations of high ionization rates of molecular hydrogen in diffuse interstellar clouds point to a distinct low-energy cosmic-ray component. Supposing that this component is made of nuclei, two models for the origin of such particles are explored and low-energy cosmic-ray spectra are calculated, which, added to the standard cosmic-ray spectra, produce the observed ionization rates. The clearest evidence of the presence of such low-energy nuclei between a few MeV nucleon(-1) and several hundred MeV nucleon(-1) in the interstellar medium would be a detection of nuclear gamma-ray line emission in the range E gamma similar to 0.1-10 MeV, which is strongly produced in their collisions with the interstellar gas and dust. Using a recent gamma-ray cross section compilation for nuclear collisions, gamma-ray line emission spectra are calculated alongside the high-energy gamma-ray emission due to pi(0) decay, the latter providing normalization of the absolute fluxes by comparison with Fermi-LAT observations of the diffuse emission above E-gamma = 0.1 GeV. Our predicted fluxes of strong nuclear gamma-ray lines from the inner Galaxy are well below the detection sensitivities of the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, but a detection, especially of the 4.4 MeV line, seems possible with new-generation gamma-ray telescopes based on available technology. We also predict strong gamma-ray continuum emission in the 1-8 MeV range, which, in a large part of our model space for low-energy cosmic rays, considerably exceeds the estimated instrument sensitivities of future telescopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available