4.7 Article

WISE TF: A MID-INFRARED, 3.4 μm EXTENSION OF THE TULLY-FISHER RELATION USING WISE PHOTOMETRY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 771, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/88

Keywords

distance scale; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: spiral; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a mid-infrared Tully-Fisher (TF) relation using photometry from the 3.4 mu m W1 band of the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) satellite. The WISE TF relation is formed from 568 galaxies taken from the all-sky 2MASS Tully-Fisher (2MTF) galaxy catalog, spanning a range of environments including field, group, and cluster galaxies. This constitutes the largest mid-infrared TF relation constructed to date. After applying a number of corrections to galaxy magnitudes and line widths, we measure a master TF relation given by M-corr = -22.24 - 10.05[log(W-corr) - 2.5], with an average dispersion of sigma(WISE) = 0.686 mag. There is some tension between WISE TF and a preliminary 3.6 mu m relation, which has a shallower slope and almost no intrinsic dispersion. However, our results agree well with a more recent relation constructed from a large sample of cluster galaxies. We additionally compare WISE TF to the near-infrared 2MTF template relations, finding a good agreement between the TF parameters and total dispersions of WISE TF and the 2MTF K-band template. This fact, coupled with typical galaxy colors of (K -W1) similar to 0, suggests that these two bands are tracing similar stellar populations, including the older, centrally-located stars in the galactic bulge which can (for galaxies with a prominent bulge) dominate the light profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available