4.7 Article

TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OF TURBULENCE IN MOLECULAR CLOUDS: SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES AS UNITS OF DYNAMICAL MULTI-PHASE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 754, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/95

Keywords

ISM: clouds; ISM: kinematics and dynamics; ISM: structure; stars: formation; turbulence

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [23540277, 23740154]
  2. Nordrhein-Westfalische Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Kunste
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23740154, 23244027, 23540277] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to investigate the origin of the interstellar turbulence, detailed observations in the CO J = 1-0 and 3-2 lines have been carried out in an interacting region of a molecular cloud with an H II region. As a result, several 1000-10,000 AU scale cloudlets with small velocity dispersion are detected, whose systemic velocities have a relatively large scatter of a few km s(-1). It is suggested that the cloud is composed of small-scale dense and cold structures and their overlapping effect makes it appear to be a turbulent entity as a whole. This picture strongly supports the two-phase model of a turbulent medium driven by thermal instability proposed previously. On the surface of the present cloud, the turbulence is likely to be driven by thermal instability following ionization shock compression and UV irradiation. Those small-scale structures with line widths of similar to 0.6 km s(-1) have a relatively high CO line ratio of J = 3-2 to 1-0, 1 less than or similar to R3-2/1-0 less than or similar to 2. The large velocity gradient analysis implies that the 0.6 km s (1) width component cloudlets have an average density of 10(3)-10(4) cm(-3), which is relatively high at cloud edges, but their masses are only less than or similar to 0.05 M-circle dot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available