4.7 Article

IS ACTIVE REGION CORE VARIABILITY AGE DEPENDENT?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 761, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/21

Keywords

Sun: atmosphere; Sun: corona; Sun: transition region

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/H000429/1, PP/D002907/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D002907/1, ST/H000429/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. UK Space Agency [ST/J001732/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of both steady and transient loops in active region cores has been reported from soft X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet observations of the solar corona. The relationship between the different loop populations, however, remains an open question. We present an investigation of the short-term variability of loops in the core of two active regions in the context of their long-term evolution. We take advantage of the nearly full Sun observations of STEREO and Solar Dynamics Observatory spacecraft to track these active regions as they rotate around the Sun multiple times. We then diagnose the variability of the active region cores at several instances of their lifetime using EIS/Hinode spectral capabilities. We inspect a broad range of temperatures, including for the first time spatially and temporally resolved images of Ca XIV and Ca XV lines. We find that the active region cores become fainter and steadier with time. The significant emission measure at high temperatures that is not correlated with a comparable increase at low temperatures suggests that high-frequency heating is viable. The presence, however, during the early stages, of an enhanced emission measure in the hot (3.0-4.5 MK) and cool (0.6-0.9 MK) components suggests that low-frequency heating also plays a significant role. Our results explain why there have been recent studies supporting both heating scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available