4.7 Article

Microlensing detections of moons of exoplanets

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 684, Issue 1, Pages 684-690

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/590331

Keywords

gravitational lensing

Funding

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06B1112, R11-2002-096-02002-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the characteristic of microlensing signals of Earth-like moons orbiting ice-giant planets. From this, we find that nonnegligible satellite signals occur when the planet-moon separation is similar to or greater than the Einstein radius of the planet. We find that the satellite signal does not diminish with the increase of the planet-moon separation beyond the Einstein radius of the planet unlike the planetary signal which vanishes when the planet is located well beyond the Einstein radius of the star. We also find that the satellite signal tends to have the same sign as that of the planetary signal. These tendencies are caused by the lensing effect of the star on the moon in addition to the effect of the planet. We determine the range of satellite separations where the microlensing technique is optimized for the detections of moons. By setting an upper limit as the angle-average of the projected Hill radius and a lower limit as the half of the Einstein radius of the planet, we find that the microlensing method would be sensitive to moons with projected separations from the planet of 0.05 AU less than or similar to d(p) less than or similar to 0.24 AU for a Jupiter-mass planet, 0.03 AU less than or similar to d(p) less than or similar to 0.17 AU for a Saturn-mass planet, and 0: 01 AU less than or similar to d(p) less than or similar to 0.08 AU for a Uranus-mass planet. We compare the characteristics of the moons to be detected by the microlensing and transit techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available