4.2 Article

Forward π± production in p-O2 and p-N2 interactions at 12 GeV/c

Journal

ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 124-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2008.07.007

Keywords

EAS; Hadronic cross-sections

Funding

  1. Institut Interuniversitaire des Sciences Nucleaires
  2. Interuniversitair Instituut voor Kernwetenschappen (Belgium)
  3. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [FPA2003-06921-c02-02]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana [GV00-054-1]
  5. CERN (Geneva, Switzerland)
  6. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (Germany)
  7. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy)
  8. INR RAS (Moscow)
  9. Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (UK)
  10. STFC [ST/H001050/1, PP/E00315X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H001050/1, PP/E00315X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of double-differential charged pion production cross-sections in interactions of 12 GeV/c protons on O-2 and N-2 thin targets are presented in the kinematic range 0.5 GeV/c <= p(pi) < 8 GeV/c and 50 mrad <= 0(pi) < 250 mrad (in the laboratory frame) and are compared with p-C results. For p-N-2 (p-O-2) interactions the analysis is performed using 38576 (7522) reconstructed secondary pions. The analysis uses the beam instrumentation and the forward spectrometer of the HARP experiment at CERN PS. The measured cross-sections have a direct impact on the precise calculation of atmospheric neutrino fluxes and on the improved reliability of extensive air shower simulations by reducing the uncertainties of hadronic interaction models in the low energy range. In particular, the present results allow the common hypothesis that p-C data can be used to predict the p-N-2 and p-O-2 pion production cross-sections to be tested. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available