4.4 Article

Comprehensive geophysical prediction and treatment measures of karst caves in deep buried tunnel

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 247-257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.03.019

Keywords

Ground Penetrating Radar; Geological Drilling; Tunnel Seismic Prediction; Beam Slab method; Backfill method

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB036000]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51139004]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479106]
  4. promotive research fund for excellent young and middle-aged scientists of Shandong Province [2014GN028]
  5. Science and Technology Project, Department of Transportation of Hubei Province [BYXYKY2012-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While tunneling in karst terrains, engineers may encounter hazardous geotechnical structures such as faults, karst caves and collapse columns which may induce geohazards and seriously endanger the construction safety. Geological processes significantly affect the varieties and characteristics of karst caves, and therefore engineering geological and hydrogeological conditions of Shangjiawan Tunnel were analyzed firstly. In order to accurately predict the geometric characteristics of karst caves and their spatial relationship with the tunnel, the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Geological Drilling (Geo-D) were applied comprehensively in the present study. The Tunnel Seismic Prediction (TSP) system was also applied to forecast whether any karst cave existed in front of the tunnel face and the detection results generally agree well with the field investigation. Furthermore, the Beam-Slab method was carried out for the treatment of the karst cave which situated under the tunnel floor, while the Backfill method was applied for the karst cave which was exposed during the construction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available