4.6 Article

The CN/C15N isotopic ratio towards dark clouds

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 557, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321364

Keywords

ISM: abundances; ISM: clouds; ISM: general; ISM: molecules; astrochemistry

Funding

  1. la Region Rhone-Alpes
  2. Physico-Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the origin of the composition of solar system cosmomaterials is a central question, not only in the cosmochemistry and astrochemistry fields, and requires various approaches to be combined. Measurements of isotopic ratios in cometary materials provide strong constraints on the content of the protosolar nebula. Their relation with the composition of the parental dark clouds is, however, still very elusive. In this paper, we bring new constraints based on the isotopic composition of nitrogen in dark clouds, with the aim of understanding the chemical processes that are responsible for the observed isotopic ratios. We have observed and detected the fundamental rotational transition of (CN)-N-15 towards two starless dark clouds, L1544 and L1498. We were able to derive the column density ratio of (CN)-N-15 over (CN)-C-13 towards the same clouds and obtain the CN/(CN)-N-15 isotopic ratios, which were found to be 500 +/- 75 for both L1544 and L1498. These values are therefore marginally consistent with the protosolar value of 441. Moreover, this ratio is larger than the isotopic ratio of nitrogen measured in HCN. In addition, we present model calculations of the chemical fractionation of nitrogen in dark clouds, which make it possible to understand how CN can be deprived of N-15 and HCN can simultaneously be enriched in heavy nitrogen. The non-fractionation of N2H+, however, remains an open issue, and we propose some chemical way of alleviating the discrepancy between model predictions and the observed ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available