4.6 Article

Implications of a new triple-α nuclear reaction rate Consequences for Cepheids

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 520, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014329

Keywords

nuclear reactions; nucleosynthesis; abundances; stars: evolution; stars: variables: Cepheids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Recently the triple-alpha reaction rate has been re-evaluated. In the temperature range, 10(7)-10(8) K, with respect to the NACRE rate, the new rate is enhanced by up to 20 orders-magnitude. Aims. To validate this new rate, we investigate its consequences for the evolution of Cepheid models. Methods. The stellar evolutionary tracks are calculated with the CESAM code and displayed in the domain 4-10 M(circle dot). Results. With the new rate, the first dredge-up does not occur. For masses larger than greater than or similar to 4.5 M(circle dot) each evolutionary track crosses the instability strip only once. The luminosities are higher than with the previous rate, then leading to smaller theoretical masses that better agree with the pulsational mass. Conversely, and inconsistently with one century of observations of more than two hundred Cepheids, the temporal derivative of the period keeps a positive sign. Moreover the observed depletions of atmospheric lithium and C/N ratio do not occur. A slight modification of only a few percents of the new nuclear rate allows us however to restore the loops inside the instability strip and the changes of sign of the temporal derivative of periods. Conclusions. This preliminary work indicates that the new rate may solve some of the long-lasting unsolved theoretical problems of Cepheids. Yet indisputable observations argue against its pertinence. Nonetheless, with regard to its theoretical importance, the triple-a new reaction rate still needs to be confirmed or revisited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available