- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The galaxy major merger fraction to ${z}$ ~ 1
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 501, Issue 2, Pages 505-518
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Online
2009-05-19
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/200911923
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- ROBUST DETERMINATION OF THE MAJOR MERGER FRACTION ATZ= 0.6 IN THE GROTH STRIP
- (2009) Carlos López-Sanjuan et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- HOW DO DISKS SURVIVE MERGERS?
- (2009) Philip F. Hopkins et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- HISTORY OF GALAXY INTERACTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON STAR FORMATION OVER THE LAST 7 Gyr FROM GEMS
- (2009) Shardha Jogee et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- THE GREATER IMPACT OF MERGERS ON THE GROWTH OF MASSIVE GALAXIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR MASS ASSEMBLY AND EVOLUTION SINCEz≃ 1
- (2009) Kevin Bundy et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- BULGEnANDB/TIN HIGH-MASS GALAXIES: CONSTRAINTS ON THE ORIGIN OF BULGES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELS
- (2009) Tim Weinzirl et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Post-starburst galaxies: more than just an interesting curiosity
- (2009) Vivienne Wild et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Termination of star formation by BH feedback in equal- and unequal-mass mergers of disk and elliptical galaxies
- (2008) P.H. Johansson et al. ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
- GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z $\mathsf{\sim2}$
- (2008) P. Cassata et al. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
- The Redshift Evolution of Wet, Dry, and Mixed Galaxy Mergers from Close Galaxy Pairs in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey
- (2008) Lihwai Lin et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Pair Analysis of Field Galaxies from the Red‐Sequence Cluster Survey
- (2008) B. C. Hsieh et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Galaxy Mergers atz ≳ 1 in the HUDF: Evidence for a Peak in the Major Merger Rate of Massive Galaxies1
- (2008) R. E. Ryan et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Toward a Robust Estimate of the Merger Rate Evolution Using Near‐IR Photometry
- (2008) A. Rawat et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Photometric Redshift Error Estimators
- (2008) Hiroaki Oyaizu et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- The Stellar Mass Assembly of Galaxies fromz= 0 toz= 4: Analysis of a Sample Selected in the Rest‐Frame Near‐Infrared withSpitzer
- (2008) Pablo G. Pérez‐González et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- The Detection of a Red Sequence of Massive Field Galaxies atz∼ 2.3 and Its Evolution toz∼ 0
- (2008) Mariska Kriek et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- The Luminosity Dependence of the Galaxy Merger Rate
- (2008) D. R. Patton et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- The Evolution of Galaxy Mergers and Morphology atz< 1.2 in the Extended Groth Strip
- (2008) Jennifer M. Lotz et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- A Cosmological Framework for the Co‐evolution of Quasars, Supermassive Black Holes, and Elliptical Galaxies. I. Galaxy Mergers and Quasar Activity
- (2008) Philip F. Hopkins et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
- Galaxy merger morphologies and time-scales from simulations of equal-mass gas-rich disc mergers
- (2008) Jennifer M. Lotz et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- The structures of distant galaxies – I. Galaxy structures and the merger rate to z ∼ 3 in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field
- (2008) Christopher J. Conselice et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- The nearly universal merger rate of dark matter haloes in ΛCDM cosmology
- (2008) Onsi Fakhouri et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- A Maximum Likelihood Method for Bidimensional Experimental Distributions and Its Application to the Galaxy Merger Fraction
- (2008) Carlos López-Sanjuan et al. PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started