4.4 Article

A solution method for the component allocation problem in printed circuit board assembly

Journal

ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 155-163

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/01445151011029790

Keywords

Regression analysis; Printed circuits; Assembly; Parts; Programming and algorithm theory

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose an effective and efficient solution method for the component allocation problem (CAP) in printed circuit board (PCB) assembly, in order to achieve high-throughput rates of the PCB assembly lines. Design/methodology/approach - The investigated CAP is intertwined with the machine optimization problems for each machine in the line because the latter determine the process time of each machine. In order to solve the CAP, a solution method, which integrates a meta-heuristic (genetic algorithm) and a regression model is proposed. Findings - It is found that the established regression model can estimate the process time of each machine accurately and efficiently. Experimental tests show that the proposed solution method can solve the CAP both effectively and efficiently. Research limitations/implications - Although different regression models are required for different types of assembly machines, the proposed solution method can be adopted for solving the CAPs for assembly lines of any configuration, including a mixed-vendor assembly line. Practical implications - The solution method can ensure a high-throughput rate of a PCB assembly line, and thus improve the production capacity without further investment on the expensive PCB assembly equipment. Originality/value - The paper proposes an innovative solution method for the CAP in PCB assembly. The solution method integrates the meta-heuristic method and the regression method, which has not been studied in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available