Validation of the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire to screen for major depression in a Chinese primary care population
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Validation of the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire to screen for major depression in a Chinese primary care population
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Asia-Pacific Psychiatry
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 61-68
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-03-28
DOI
10.1111/appy.12063
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comparison of the CES-D and PHQ-9 depression scales in people with type 2 diabetes in Tehran, Iran
- (2011) Mohammad E Khamseh et al. BMC Psychiatry
- Measuring depression severity in general practice: discriminatory performance of the PHQ-9, HADS-D, and BDI-II
- (2011) Isobel M Cameron et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Collaborative Care for Depression and Chronic Illnesses
- (2011) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research
- (2011) Alex J. Mitchell et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Depression care management for late-life depression in China primary care: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- (2011) Shulin Chen et al. Trials
- Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to Screen for Major Depression in the Primary Care Population
- (2010) B. Arroll et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly
- (2010) Elizabeth Phelan et al. BMC Family Practice
- Identification of depression in diabetes: the efficacy of PHQ-9 and HADS-D
- (2010) Prasuna Reddy et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Evolution of primary care in China 1997–2009
- (2010) Onil Bhattacharyya et al. HEALTH POLICY
- Collaborative Care for Patients with Depression and Chronic Illnesses
- (2010) Wayne J. Katon et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Comparison of two self-rating scales to detect depression: HADS and PHQ-9
- (2009) Maja Hansson et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Reliability and validity of the PHQ-9 for screening late-life depression in Chinese primary care
- (2009) Shulin Chen et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
- Screening for depression: Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the PHQ-9 and the HADS-D
- (2009) Friederike Kendel et al. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
- Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Assess Increased Risk of Depression among Postpartum Women
- (2009) B. P. Yawn et al. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- Prevalence, treatment, and associated disability of mental disorders in four provinces in China during 2001–05: an epidemiological survey
- (2009) Michael R Phillips et al. LANCET
- Study of the Discriminative Validity of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 in a Sample of Brazilian Women in the Context of Primary Health Care
- (2009) Flávia de Lima Osório et al. PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE
- Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the PHQ-9
- (2008) Manote Lotrakul et al. BMC Psychiatry
- Prevalence and rates of recognition of depressive disorders in internal medicine outpatient departments of 23 general hospitals in Shenyang, China
- (2008) Xiaoxia Qin et al. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
- Validity/Reliability of PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 Depression Scales Among Adults Living with HIV/AIDS in Western Kenya
- (2008) Patrick O. Monahan et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Comparing the BDI-II and the PHQ-9 with outpatient substance abusers
- (2007) Mariam Dum et al. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
- Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression screening among Chinese Americans
- (2007) Albert Yeung et al. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started