4.2 Article

Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis: A systematic review

Journal

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 357-364

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12081

Keywords

advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; transarterial chemoembolization; treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsAdvanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis has been considered a contraindication for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification. However, real clinical practice varies among different countries. In recent years another opinion has been developing that considers that TACE can be safely performed in advanced HCC patients. MethodsAll studies on the efficacy of TACE for patients with advanced HCC were identified via the PubMed database. The primary items were TACE and HCC. ResultsWe identified 15 studies in the treatment of TACE in advanced HCC patients. Most adverse events reported were treated successfully and in these studies there were no procedure-related deaths within 4 weeks of the TACE treatment. Four controlled studies reported that TACE increased survival rate and prolonged overall survival compared with conservative management. The most frequent prognostic factors were liver function and the degree of portal vein tumor thrombosis. ConclusionTACE can be safely performed in advanced HCC patients with vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread and may improve their overall survival. Patients with portal vein branch invasion and well-preserved liver function seemed to derive optimal benefit from treatment with TACE. Further studies are needed to provide strong evidence of the efficacy of TACE for advanced HCC patients to update the BCLC staging system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available