4.3 Article

Comparing the secretory pathway in honeybee venom and hypopharyngeal glands

Journal

ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 107-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2012.10.004

Keywords

End-apparatus; Type 3 gland cell; Venom gland; Royal jelly; Apis mellifera; Actin cytoskeleton

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Queensland Research Scholarship from the Graduate School
  2. School of Biological Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We provide insights into the secretory pathway of arthropod gland systems by comparing the royal jelly-producing hypopharyngeal glands and the venom-producing glands of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. These glands have different functions and different product release characteristics, but both belong to the class 3 types of insect glands, each being composed of two cells, a secretory cell and a microduct-forming cell. The hypopharyngeal secretory cells possess an extremely elongate tubular invagination that is filled with a cuticular structure, the end-apparatus, anchored against the cell membrane by a conspicuous series of actin rings. In contrast, venom glands have no actin rings, but instead have an actin-rich brush border surrounding the comparatively short and narrow end-apparatus. We relate these cytoskeletal differences to the production system and utilisation of secretions; venom is stored in a reservoir whereas royal jelly and enzymes are produced on demand. Fluorescence-based characterisation of the actin cytoskeleton combined with scanning electron microscopy of the end-apparatus allows for detailed characterisation of the point of secretion release in insect class 3 glands. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available