4.4 Article

A new isolate of beak and feather disease virus from endemic wild red-fronted parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) in New Zealand

Journal

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
Volume 155, Issue 4, Pages 613-620

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-010-0607-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Canterbury (Science Faculty Early Career Grant)
  2. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Massey University (Institute of Natural Sciences)
  3. University of Auckland (School of Biological Sciences)
  4. Motuihe Island Trust
  5. Tawharanui Open Sanctuary Supporters Inc.
  6. Auckland Regional Council
  7. National Council of Science from Mexico (CONACYT)
  8. New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology [UOCX0601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Psittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD) is a viral disease distributed worldwide with a potentially critical impact on many rare parrots. While efforts have been made to determine its prevalence in wild and captive psittacines, only limited work has been done to document complete genomes of its causative agent, beak and feather disease virus (BFDV). Here, we describe five full genomes of BFDV isolated from wild specimens of an endemic New Zealand parrot, the red-fronted parakeet (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae). The isolates share >99% nucleotide similarity amongst themselves and similar to 91-92% similarity to BFDV isolates from southern Africa, Europe and Australia. A maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree including 42 other full-genome sequences indicated that the five isolates from red-fronted parakeets represent an undescribed genotype of BFDV. These isolates are evolutionarily most closely related to the Cacatuini isolates from Thailand and the Lorinae isolates from Australia in the rep gene ML tree; however, in the cp ML tree, the evolutionary relationship is closer to viruses found in the Psittacini.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available