Journal
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages 301-307Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-009-0500-5
Keywords
Melamine; Powdered formula; Urolithiasis; Oxidative DNA damage; 8-OHdG
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
There is evidence in experimental animals for the urolithiasis and carcinogenicity of melamine, but no evidence for melamine in humans. To evaluate any association between melamine-contaminated powdered formula (MCPF) feeding and urolithiasis, and further the MCPF feeding and oxidative damage to DNA in infants. A cross-sectional study was carried out to assess urolithiasis and urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in four groups of infants according to the type of feeding: (1) Infants receiving over 90% of their intake as MCPF. (2) Infants receiving 50-90% of their intake as MCPF. (3) Infants receiving less than 50% of their intake as MCPF. (4) Infants receiving over 90% of their intake as imported milk powdered formula free of melamine contamination. Groups 1 to 3 are the observation groups, and Group 4 is the reference group. There is a significant correlation between urolithiasis and percentage of MCPF intake. The mean urinary 8-OHdG concentrations for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were: 2.03 +/- A 0.52, 1.67 +/- A 0.28, 1.90 +/- A 0.39, and 1.85 +/- A 0.47 micromoles per mole of creatinine, respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean urinary 8-OHdG concentrations among the observation and control groups. There were also no correlation between mean urinary 8-OHdG excretions and percentage of MCPF intake. Our data suggested that melamine exposure were associated with urolithiasis, but it might not cause any increase in oxidative damage of DNA in infants.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available