4.6 Article

Cost-Effectiveness of Supported Employment for Veterans With Spinal Cord Injuries

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages 1254-1261

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.010

Keywords

Cost-benefit analysis; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Vocational rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Veterans Health Administration Rehabilitation Research and Development [B3773R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a supported employment (SE) intervention that had been previously found effective in veterans with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis, using cost and quality-of-life data gathered in a trial of SE for veterans with SCI. Setting: SCI centers in the Veterans Health Administration. Participants: Subjects (N=157) who completed a study of SE in 6 SCI centers. Subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention of SE (n=81) or treatment as usual (n=76). Intervention: A vocational rehabilitation program of SE for veterans with SCI. Main Outcome Measures: Costs and quality-adjusted life years, which were estimated from the Veterans Rand 36-Item Health Survey, extrapolated to Veterans Rand 6 Dimension utilities. Results: Average cost for the SE intervention was $1821. In 1 year of follow-up, estimated total costs, including health care utilization and travel expenses, and average quality-adjusted life years were not significantly different between groups, suggesting the Spinal Cord Injury Vocational Integration Program intervention was not cost-effective compared with usual care. Conclusions: An intensive program of SE for veterans with SCI, which is more effective in achieving competitive employment, is not cost-effective after 1 year of follow-up. Longer follow-up and a larger study sample will be necessary to determine whether SE yields benefits and is cost-effective in the long run for a population with SCI. (C) 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available