Journal
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages 849-856Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.023
Keywords
Neurophysiology; Paresis; Rehabilitation; Stroke
Categories
Funding
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Division of Intramural Research [Z01NS003030]
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Training Program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To determine whether nonparetic arm force overinhibits the paretic arm in patients with chronic unilateral poststroke hemiparesis. Design: Case-control neurophysiological and behavioral study of patients with chronic stroke. Setting: Research institution. Participants: Eighty-six referred patients were screened to enroll 9 participants (N=9) with a > 6 month history of 1 unilateral ischemic infarct that resulted in arm hemiparesis with residual ability to produce 1Nm of wrist flexion torque and without contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eight age- and handedness-matched healthy volunteers without neurologic diagnosis were studied for comparison. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Change in interhemispheric inhibition targeting the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) during nonparetic arm force. We hypothesized that interhemispheric inhibition would increase more in healthy controls than in patients with hemiparesis. Results: Healthy age-matched controls had significantly greater increases in inhibition from their active to resting M1 than patients with stroke from their active contralesional to resting ipsilesional M1 in the same scenario (20% +/- 7% vs -1% +/- 4%, F (1,12)=6.61, P =.025). Patients with greater increases in contralesional to ipsilesional inhibition were better performers on the 9-hole peg test of paretic arm function. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that producing force with the nonparetic arm does not necessarily overinhibit the paretic arm. Though our study is limited in generalizability by the small sample size, we found that greater active contralesional to resting ipsilesional M1 inhibition was related with better recovery in this subset of patients with chronic poststroke. (C) 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available