4.6 Article

Virtual Lesioning of the Human Oropharyngeal Motor Cortex: A Videofluoroscopic Study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages 1987-1990

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.020

Keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Deglutition disorders; Rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Aides a Domicile aux Insuffisants Respiratoires (ADIR), Isneauville, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To use focal cortical inhibition and create a virtual lesion in the oropharyngeal motor cortex in healthy subjects to determine whether this provokes swallowing dysfunction. Design: Intervention study: before and after cortical stimulation. Setting: Tertiary care center. Participants: Healthy adult volunteers (N=9; age range, 21 44y) participated in the study. Interventions: Active or sham 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the cortical sites in each hemisphere evoking the largest mylohyoid motor-evoked potentials (mMEPs) to single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Main Outcome Measures: Videofluoroscopic assessment was performed before and 5, 30, and 60 minutes after rTMS. Results: The motor threshold was 83%+/- 10% for the hemisphere with the larger mMEP (dominant) and 92%+/- 9% for the hemisphere with the smaller mMEP (nondominant). When rTMS was performed over the dominant hemisphere, there was a decrease in oral transit time (P=.05), an increase in swallow reaction time (P=.0001), but no change of pharyngeal transit time or laryngeal closure duration. When rTMS was performed on the nondominant hemisphere, there was also a decrease in oral transit time (P=.05), but no change in any of the other swallowing measures. Neither active intervention produced any signs of aspiration or penetration. Sham stimulation had no effect. Conclusions: Inhibiting the human oropharyngeal motor cortex using rTMS transiently modifies swallowing behavior in a way reminiscent to that seen in stroke patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available