4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

ABILOCO: A Rasch-built 13-item questionnaire to assess locomotion ability in stroke patients

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 284-290

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.155

Keywords

locomotion; questionnaires; rehabilitation; stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To develop a questionnaire (ABILOCO), based on the Rasch measurement model, that can assess locomotion ability in adult stroke patients (Internationol Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health activity domain). Design: Prospective study and questionnaire development. Setting: A faculty hospital. Participants: Adult stroke patients (N=100) (age. 64 +/- 15y). The time since stroke ranged from I to 260 weeks. Intervention: A preliminary questionnaire included 43 items representing a large sample of locomotion activities. This questionnaire was tested on the 100 stroke patients, and their responses were analyzed using the Rasch model (RUMM 2020 software) to select items that had an ordered rating scale and fitted a unidimensional model. Main Outcome Measure: The ABILOCO questionnaire. Results: The retained items resulted in a 13-item questionnaire. which includes a wide ran-e of locomotion abilities well targeted to the sample population, leading to good reliability (R=.93). The item calibration was independent of age, sex, time since stroke, and affected side. The concurrent validity of ABILOCO was also investigated by comparing it with well-known. criterion standard scales (Functional Walking Category. Functional Ambulation Categories, item 12 of the FIM instrument evaluating walking ability) and the walking speed measured with the 10-meter walk test. Conclusions: The ABILOCO questionnaire presents good psychometric qualities to measure locomotion ability in adult stroke patients. Its range and measurement precision make it attractive for clinical use throughout the rehabilitation process and for clinical research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available