4.6 Article

Synthesis and biological evaluation of some novel urea and thiourea derivatives of isoxazolo[4,5-d]pyridazine and structurally related thiazolo[4,5-d]pyridazine as antimicrobial agents

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 1354-1368

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-013-0144-0

Keywords

Synthesis; Urea; Thiourea; Isoxazolo[4,5-d]pyridazine; Thiazolo[4,5-d]pyridazine; Antimicrobial activity

Funding

  1. SABIC
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [MS/13/349/1932]
  3. DSR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the synthesis of some novel isoxazolo[4,5-d]pyridazines and structurally related thiazolo[4,5-d]pyridazines, and their biological evaluation as antimicrobial agents. The proposed compounds were designed to contain pharmacophores such as urea, thiourea, sulfonylurea (thiourea) and some derived functionalities that are believed to contribute to the anticipated biological activities. The results revealed that 25 compounds displayed broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, with greater inhibitory effect on the growth of the tested Gram positive strains compared to Gram negative ones. Moreover, 14 compounds were able to produce appreciable growth inhibitory activity against Candida albicans fungus when compared to Clotrimazole. Most of the tested isoxazolo[4,5-d]pyridazines displayed better antimicrobial profile than their corresponding thiazolo[4,5-d]pyridazine congeners. Four compounds namely, p-(3,7-dimethyl-4-oxo-4H-isoxazolo [4,5-d]pyridazine-5-yl)benzenesulfonylthioureas (11c-d), 3-substituted-2-[p-(3,7-dimethyl-4-oxo-4H-isoxazolo[4,5-d]pyridazine-5-yl)-benzene-sufonylimino]-4-oxothiazolidines (13d) and p-(2,7-dimethyl-4-oxo-4H-thiazolo[4,5-d]pyridazin-5-yl)benzenesulfonylthiourea (24c) were found to be most active antimicrobial members in present study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available