4.7 Article

Tolerability of aztreonam and carbapenems in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages 972-976

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.011

Keywords

Aztreonam; cross-reactivity; ertapenem; imipenem; meropenem; penicillin allergy; skin tests; tolerability

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry for University, Scientific and Technological Research (MURST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies performed on samples larger than 100 subjects with a documented IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins have demonstrated a cross-reactivity rate of approximately 1% between penicillins and both imipenem and meropenem, whereas a single study found a cross-reactivity rate of 6.2% with aztreonam in 16 such subjects. Objective: To assess the cross-reactivity and tolerability of aztreonam and 3 carbapenems (imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and ertapenem) in patients with documented IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. Methods: A total of 212 consecutive subjects with immediate reactions to penicillins and positive results on skin tests to at least 1 penicillin reagent underwent skin tests with aztreonam and carbapenems; subjects with negative results were challenged with escalating doses of aztreonam and carbapenems. Results: All subjects displayed negative skin test results to both aztreonam and carbapenems; 211 accepted challenges and tolerated them. Challenges were not followed by full therapeutic courses. Conclusions: These data indicate the tolerability of both aztreonam and carbapenems in penicillin-allergic subjects. In those who especially require these alternative beta-lactams, however, we recommend pretreatment skin tests, both because rare cases of cross-reactivity have been reported and because negative results indicate tolerability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available