3.9 Article

Decrease in Adolescent Cannabis Use From 2002 to 2006 and Links to Evenings Out With Friends in 31 European and North American Countries and Regions

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
Volume 163, Issue 2, Pages 119-125

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.542

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health [04.001776/2.24.02.-64]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare adolescent cannabis use between 2002 and 2006 and to investigate links to the frequency of evenings spent out with friends. Design: The Health Behavior in School-Aged Children study, an international study carried out in collaboration with the World Health Organization/Europe. Setting: A total of 31 mostly European and North American countries and regions. Participants: A total of 93 297 students aged 15 years. Outcome Measure: Cannabis use in the last 12 months in relation to the mean frequency of evenings out with friends per week. Results: A decrease in the prevalence of cannabis use was found in most of the 31 participating countries and regions. The most marked decreases were found in England, Portugal, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Canada. Increases occurred only in Estonia, Lithuania, Malta, and among Russian girls. The more frequently adolescents reported going out with their friends in the evenings, the more likely they were to report using cannabis. This link was consistent for boys and girls and across survey years. Across countries, changes in the mean frequency of evenings spent out were strongly linked to changes in cannabis use. Conclusions: The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that by going out less frequently in the evenings with friends, adolescents had fewer opportunities to obtain and use cannabis. Future research is needed to learn more about the nature of evenings out with friends and related factors that might explain changes in adolescent cannabis use over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available