4.5 Article

Is there a relationship between admission blood glucose level following acute poisoning and clinical outcome?

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 81-86

Publisher

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.20608

Keywords

blood glucose; acute poisoning; outcome; poisoning severity score; hyperglycaemia

Funding

  1. Isfahan clinical toxicology research center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the admission blood glucose level following acute poisoning, severity of acute poisoning and clinical outcome. Material and methods: This prospective study was conducted on 345 deliberate self-poisoning patients. Standard demographic and clinical information; admission blood glucose level; poisoning severity score and outcome were recorded. Patients with a history of diabetes mellitus, receipt of pre-sampling intravenous dextrose solution or glucocorticoids, and poisoning with toxic agents which produce hyper- or hypoglycaemia were excluded. Results: Mean age of the patients was 27.5 +/- 8.6 years. Females outnumbered males (57.9%). Oral ingestion of more than one drug (46.7%) and opiates (14.2%) were the main causes of poisoning. Blood glucose values ranged from 50 mg/dl to 396 mg/dl. Hyper- and hypoglycaemia were observed in 23.8% and 13.91% respectively. A total of 24.41% and 22.92% of the patients in hyper- and hypoglycaemic groups had grade 3 and 4 severity score in comparison with 4.18% in the normoglycaemic group. Development of complications and death were 14.64% and 10.42% in patients with hyper- and hypoglycaemia versus 3.73% in patients with normoglycaemia. A significant difference between normoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic patients in the severity of poisoning and clinical outcome was observed (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Admission blood glucose levels may have a relationship with the severity of poisoning and clinical outcome following acute poisoning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available