4.6 Article

VEGF-C as a Decision-making Biomarker for Selected Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Underwent Bladder-preserving Radical Surgery

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 405-411

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.07.006

Keywords

Bladder transitional cell carcinoma; Radical transurethral resection; Vascular endothelial growth factor C; Lymphatic metastasis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30700832]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims. We proved the feasibility of radical transurethral resection in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a minimum follow-up of >5 years. A follow-up schedule was developed based on progression and recurrence during this period. Methods. The study included 93 patients with invasive bladder cancer treated by radical transurethral resection. Student t test was used for continuous variables to establish clinical progression predictive factors. VEGF-C protein expressions were tested by immunohistochemistry postsurgery. Results. The overall survival and disease-specific survival rates for all 93 patients were 59.1% and 65.2%, respectively. The clinical stage of the tumor influenced overall survival (p = 0.024) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.047). A significantly higher overall survival and disease-specific survival rate for patients with low levels of VEGF-C was 69.6% and 75.0%, respectively, than for those with high levels of VEGF-C (45.9 and 54.1%, respectively, p <0.05). The presence of bladder Tis reduced the survival rate (41.2 vs. 65.3%) and disease-specific survival (45.4 vs. 72.1%). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of VEGF-C in the evaluation of disease progression were 76.7, 77.8, 77.4%, respectively. Conclusions. Patients with T2 stage, low level of VEGF-C and absence of bladder Tis were associated with high overall survival and disease-specific survival rate. VEGF-C level can evaluate disease progression and assist in choosing the appropriate treatment. (C) 2011 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available