4.4 Article

Effects of oral estradiol and levonorgestrel on cardiovascular risk markers in postmenopausal women

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
Volume 285, Issue 6, Pages 1647-1656

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2222-9

Keywords

Menopause; Hormone replacement therapy; Lipids; Lipoproteins; Blood coagulation factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed at investigating changes in postmenopausal women's cardiovascular risk markers induced by hormone therapy regimens of low (1.0 mg) or ultra-low (0.5 mg) doses of micronized estradiol (mE(2)) and levonorgestrel (LNG). Three randomized placebo-controlled trials were reanalyzed with regard to changes in cardiovascular risk markers, such as serum lipids, lipoproteins, and coagulation parameters. Trial 1 ( = 210) was an 8-week study comparing the effects of 1.0 or 0.5 mg of unopposed mE(2) on menopausal symptoms. Trial 2 ( = 194) was a 24-week study comparing the effects of 1.0 mg of mE(2) combined with 10, 20, or 40 mu g of LNG on endometrial safety. Trial 3 ( = 195) was a 52-week study comparing the effects of 1.0 or 0.5 mg mE(2) + 40 mu g LNG on bone metabolism. 1.0 mg of unopposed mE(2) reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after as little as 8 weeks. 1.0 mg mE(2) for 24 weeks lowered the serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C, whereas the addition of LNG caused decreases in the levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) in a dose-dependent fashion. 1.0 or 0.5 mg mE(2) + 40 mu g LNG for 52 weeks also lowered the levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG. Both regimens slightly lowered antithrombin and Protein C activities within normal limits. Hormone therapy using 1.0 or 0.5 mg of mE(2) and LNG lowers the serum levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG without significantly affecting coagulation/fibrinolysis parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available