4.5 Article

Burden, anxiety and depression in caregivers of veterans with dementia in Beijing

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 560-563

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.05.014

Keywords

Chinese veteran; Dementia; Caregivers; Care burden; Depression; Anxiety; Beijing

Funding

  1. Special Grant for Chinese Military Health-Care [07BJZ04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dementia is the most common neurodegenerative disease in the elderly. The number of Chinese dementia patients reached 5 million in 2001 and will grow rapidly by 314-336% in 2040. Caring for patients with dementia is a stressful experience, which can cause the physical and mental problems in caregivers. According to the protocol, we evaluated the burden, depression and anxiety of caregivers by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale, Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). 90 caregivers of dementia patients and 90 caregivers of nondementia patients with other chronic diseases from 24 military communities in Beijing were enrolled in this investigation. The scores of burden, depression and anxiety increased from nondementia to severe dementia groups. There were associations between patient's CDR score and CBI score, as well as the average daily care time and CBI score. In addition, the scores of SDS and SAS were both positive correlated to CBI score. Comparing to general community, the caregivers of dementia veterans had lower scores in SDS and SAS. Therefore, we should pay more attentions to the caregivers of severe dementia patients. Reduction of daily care time is a possible way to releasing the burden of caregivers. Better general supports are beneficial to reducing depression and anxiety when caregivers confront the heavy burden. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available