3.9 Article

The Influence of Age and Sex on Reasons for Seeking and Expected Benefits of Skin Cancer Screening

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 10, Pages 1097-1102

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.254

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Pittsburgh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the influence of age and sex on why individuals seek skin cancer screening and their understanding of its benefits. Design: Voluntary survey. Setting: Academic dermatology department. Participants: Individuals 18 years or older being seen for skin cancer screening from May to October 2009. Main Outcome Measures: Patients' reasons for seeking and perceived benefits of skin cancer screening and understanding of screening recommendations. Results: Of 546 patients, 487 eligible individuals (89.2%) participated in the survey. Most (80.6%) sought screening without a particular lesion of concern. Women were more likely than men to present with a lesion they believed could be skin cancer (24.6% vs 11.9%; P < .001) or because they were concerned about previous sun exposure (34.3% vs 23.8%; P < .05). Individuals younger than 50 years were more likely than older patients to seek screening because of a family history of melanoma (30% vs 18.9%; P < .01). Men 50 years or older were more likely than other patients to seek skin cancer screening because of a previous skin cancer diagnosis (64.6% vs 40.8%; P < .001). Most patients believed that screening reduces the risk of death from skin cancer and prevents skin cancer. There was no consensus among patients regarding the frequency with which healthy adults should be screened for skin cancer. Conclusions: There is a need for better educational campaigns with specific recommendation for who should be screened for skin cancer. Men 50 years or older, the group at highest risk for death from melanoma, are most likely to seek screening only after being diagnosed as having a skin cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available