4.6 Article

Examination of the carboxylesterase phenotype in human liver

Journal

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 522, Issue 1, Pages 44-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.04.010

Keywords

Carboxylesterases; Human liver; CES1; Activity-based probes; Interindividual variation; Pesticides

Funding

  1. LTCDS (NIH) [N01-DK-9-2310]
  2. Jiangsu Academy of Agriculturual Sciences-Mississippi State University
  3. NIH [P20 RR017661, 1R15ES015348-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carboxylesterases (CES) metabolize esters. Two CES isoforms are expressed in human liver (CES1 and CES2) and liver extracts are used in reaction phenotyping studies to discern interindividual metabolic variation. We tested the hypothesis that an individual's CES phenotype can be characterized by reporter substrates/probes that interrogate native CES1 and CES2 activities in liver and immunoblotting methods. We obtained 25 livers and found that CES1 is the main hydrolytic enzyme. Moreover, although CES1 protein levels were similar, we observed large interindividual variation in bioresmethrin hydrolysis rates (17-fold), a pyrethroid metabolized by CES1 but not CES2. Bioresmethrin hydrolysis rates did not correlate with CES1 protein levels. In contrast, procaine hydrolysis rates, a drug metabolized by CES2 but not CES1, were much less variant (3-fold). Using activity-based fluorophosphonate probes (FP-biotin), which covalently reacts with active serine hydrolases, CES1 protein was the most active enzyme in the livers. Finally, using bioorthogonal probes and click chemistry methodology, the half-life of CES 1 and 2 in cultured HepG2 cells was estimated at 96 h. The cause of the differential CES1 activities is unknown, but the underlying factors will be important to understand because several carboxylic acid ester drugs and environmental toxicants are metabolized by this enzyme. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available