4.7 Article

Multiple risk factors predict recurrence of major depressive disorder in women

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 52-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.045

Keywords

Major depressive disorder; Prediction; Recurrence; Women

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [MH49492]
  2. National Institutes of Health, United States [UL1RR031990]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It is difficult to predict recurrence of depressive episodes in patients with major depression (MD): evidence for many risk factors is inconsistent and general prediction algorithins are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for recurrence of depressive episodes in women using improved methodology. Methods: We used prospective data from a general population sample of female twins with a last-year MD episode (n=194). A rich set of baseline predictors was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression subject to elastic net regularization to find a model predicting recurrence of depressive episodes. Prediction accuracy of the model was assessed in an independent test sample (n =133), which was limited by the unavailability of a number of key predictors. Results: A wide variety of risk factors predicted recurrence of depressive episodes in women: depressive and anxiety symptoms during the index episode, the level of symptoms at the moment of interview, psychiatric and family history, early and recent adverse life events, being unmarried, and problems with friends and finances. Kaplan Meier estimated survival curves showed that the model differentiated between patients at higher and lower risk for recurrence; estimated areas under the curve were in the range of 0.61-0.79. Limitations: Despite our rich set of predictors, certain potentially relevant variables were not available, such as biological measures, chronic somatic diseases, and treatment status. Conclusions: Recurrence of episodes of MD in women is highly multifactorial. Future studies should take this into account for the development of clinically useful prediction algorithms. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available