4.7 Article

Acute and sub-lethal response to mercury in Arctic and boreal calanoid copepods

Journal

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 160-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.06.019

Keywords

Calanus finmarchicus; Calanus glacialis; Comparative ecotoxicology; Stress gene transcription; Polar; Glutathione S-transferase

Funding

  1. SINTEF
  2. Svalbard Science Forum [2008-370]
  3. Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters (DKNVS)
  4. NTNU [81128000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute lethal toxicity, expressed as LC50 values, is a widely used parameter in risk assessment of chemicals, and has been proposed as a tool to assess differences in species sensitivities to chemicals between climatic regions. Arctic Calanus glacialis and boreal Calanus finmarchicus were exposed to mercury (Hg2+) under natural environmental conditions including sea temperatures of 2 degrees and 10 degrees C, respectively. Acute lethal toxicity (96 h LC50) and sub-lethal molecular response (GST expression; in this article gene expression is used as a synonym of gene transcription, although it is acknowledged that gene expression is also regulated, e.g., at translation and protein stability level) were studied. The acute lethal toxicity was monitored for 96 h using seven different Hg concentrations. The sublethal experiment was set up on the basis of nominal LC50 values for each species using concentrations equivalent to 50,5 and 0.5% of their 96 h LC50 value. No significant differences were found in acute lethal toxicity between the two species. The sub-lethal molecular response revealed large differences both in response time and the fold induction. of GST, where the Arctic species responded both faster and with higher mRNA levels of GST after 48 h exposure. Under the natural exposure conditions applied in the present study, the Arctic species C. glacialis may potentially be more susceptible to mercury exposure on the sub-lethal level. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available