4.7 Article

Toxic effects and bioaccumulation of nano-, micron- and ionic-Ag in the polychaete, Nereis diversicolor

Journal

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 3-4, Pages 403-411

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.07.014

Keywords

Silver nanoparticles; Marine invertebrate; Sediment exposure; Genotoxicity; Ag body burden

Funding

  1. Roskilde University (RUC)
  2. EU [CP-FP 214478-2]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing concern about the toxicities and potential risks, both still poorly understood, of silver nanoparticles for the aquatic environment after their eventual release via wastewater discharges. In this study, the toxicities of sediment associated nano (<100 nm)-, micron (2-3.5 mu m)- and ionic (AgNO3)-Ag on the sediment-dwelling polychaete, Nereis diversicolor, were compared after 10 days of sediment exposure, using survival, DNA damage (comet assay) and bioaccumulation as endpoints. The nominal concentrations used in all exposure scenarios were 0, 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mu g Ag/g dry weight (dw) sediment. Our results showed that Ag was able to cause DNA damage in Nereis coelomocytes, and that this effect was both concentration- and Ag form-related. There was significantly greater genotoxicity (higher tail moment and tail DNA intensities) at 25 and 50 mu g/g dw in nano- and micron-Ag treatments and at 50 mu g/g dw in the ionic-Ag treatment compared to the controls (0 mu g/g dw). The nano-Ag treatment had the greatest genotoxic effect of the three tested Ag forms, and the ionic-Ag treatment was the least genotoxic. N. diversicolor did accumulate sediment-associated Ag from all three forms. Ag body burdens at the highest exposure concentration were 8.56 +/- 6.63, 6.92 +/- 5.86 and 9.86 +/- 4.94 mu g/g dw for worms in nano-, micron- and ionic-Ag treatments, respectively, but there was no significant difference in Ag bioaccumulation among the three treatments. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available