4.5 Article

Dietary choline requirement in slight methionine-deficient diet for juvenile gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio)

Journal

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 620-627

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00930.x

Keywords

choline chloride; gibel carp; lipid metabolism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program (NKBRP) [2009CB118702]
  2. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-46-19]
  3. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201003020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 10-week feeding trial was conducted in a flow-through system to determine dietary choline requirement for juvenile gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) (5.5 +/- 0.1 g). Purified basal diet was formulated using vitamin-free casein as protein source. Choline chloride was supplemented to the basal diet to formulate seven diets containing 76.1, 163, 356, 969, 1457, 2024 and 4400 mg kg(-1) choline. Dietary methionine was 0.58%, less than the requirement (0.69%). The results indicated that specific growth rate (SGR) was higher in the fish fed 2024 mg kg(-1) diet than the control group. Feeding rate and feed efficiency were not significantly affected. Protein productive value increased as dietary choline increased from 76.1 to 2024 mg kg(-1) diet and was lower in the fish fed the diet containing 4400 mg choline kg(-1) diet. Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol significantly increased with increasing dietary choline up to 1457 mg kg(-1), and no differences were found with further increase. Fish carcass fat contents decreased significantly with increased dietary choline. Hepatic lipid contents increased with dietary choline up to 1457 mg kg(-1) and then decreased. Quadric regression of SGR and plasma HDL-C indicted dietary choline requirement was 2500 and 2667 mg kg(-1) diet, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available