4.5 Article

The optimal dietary level of ascorbic acid for juvenile Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis

Journal

AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 327-336

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-012-9555-z

Keywords

L-ascorbyl-2-monophosphate-Mg; Pacific bluefin tuna; Thunnus orientalis; Fish growth; Vitamin C; Proximate composition

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A feeding experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of, and determine the requirements for dietary AsA (l-ascorbic acid) using its popular derivative l-ascorbyl-2-monophosphate-Mg (APM) for juvenile Pacific bluefin tuna (PBT). The five test diets (with APM-0, -400, -800, -1200 and -1600) were prepared by adding 0, 400, 800, 1200 and 1600 mg of APM kg diet(-1), respectively. These diets, together with chopped sand lance (the control diet), were administered, in duplicate to 0.27 g PBT at 25 days after hatching (300 juveniles per 15 m(3) tank). The PBT were fed to apparent satiety 6 times a day for 2 weeks. While final body weight, feed conversion and survival showed no differences among diets APM 400-1600, PBT fed APM-0 indicated lower growth performance together with anorexia, dark pigmentation and ataxia from 5 days and reached 80 % mortality at 12 days after the start of the feeding trial. In addition, liver and brain ascorbic acid (AsA) concentrations increased with increasing dietary APM levels, the values were similar in PBT fed diets with APM-1200 and APM-1600, and liver and brain concentrations of AsA were significantly higher in these fish than in the PBT fed the other diets (P < 0.05). The PBT responded to increasing dietary APM, and the fish fed APM-1200 had the highest weight gain, protein and lipid content. The data indicate that PBT can utilize APM as an AsA source and suggest that dietary supplementation with APM-1200 (454 mg AsA kg(-1) diet) would result in satisfactory growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available