4.7 Article

Dietary lysine requirement of juvenile Pacific threadfin (Polydactylus sexfilis)

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 308, Issue 1-2, Pages 44-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.07.041

Keywords

Lysine; Pacific threadfin; Amino acid requirement

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service [59-5320-2-712]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to develop an amino acid test diet for Pacific threadfin (Polydactylus sexfilis) and estimate its lysine (Lys) requirement based on growth performance. A basal test diet was formulated using Pacific threadfin muscle and a mixture of precoated crystalline amino acids as the protein sources to achieve the same amino acid profile as in Pacific threadfin muscle with the exception of Lys. An 8-week growth trial was conducted with juvenile fish (initial body weight, 3.0 0.1 g) fed eight isonitrogenous (35% crude protein) and isoenergetic (19.1 MJ/kg diet) semi-purified diets containing 1.26% to 2.91% Lys. The fish were cultured in an indoor flow-through system with 31 parts per thousand seawater at 25 degrees C. There were three replicate groups per dietary treatment. No mortalities occurred during the growth trial. Fish fed diets containing 2.23-2.43% Lys had higher specific growth rate, feed efficiency, protein efficiency ratio and protein retention than those fed diets containing less than 1.69% Lys. Excess dietary Lys also decreased growth of fish significantly. The basal diet (1.26% of Lys) resulted in higher liver but lower carcass to body weight ratio. Fish fed the diet containing 1.26% Lys showed significantly higher whole-body lipid and energy levels but lower moisture and protein levels than those fish fed the other diets. Broken-line analysis of the growth data indicated that the Lys requirement was 1.79% of diet (5.1% protein) under current culture conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available