4.7 Article

Nucleate boiling heat transfer of R134a on cold sprayed CNT-Cu composite coatings

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 56, Issue 1-2, Pages 112-119

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.03.046

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Copper matrix composites; Cold spray process; Mechanical alloying; Nucleate boiling heat transfer

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government [2012015020]
  3. Energy Efficiency & Resources of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  4. Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea [20122010100120]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20122010100120] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the application of mechanical alloying and cold spray process on the fabrication of carbon nanotube-copper (CNT-Cu) composite surface coatings for boiling heat transfer was investigated. Three types of coatings (5, 10, and 15 vol.% CNT) were fabricated. Boiling heat transfer of CNT-Cu composite coatings was investigated under a pool of saturated R134a at 4.8 +/- 0.04 degrees C. Results showed that nucleate boiling can be enhanced by CNT-Cu composite powder coatings fabricated by cold spray. Incipience superheat of the coatings (5-6 K) was considerably lower than that of the plain Cu plate (8 K). At heat fluxes >20 kW/m(2), significant differences in the enhancement ratios were observed. The maximum heat transfer coefficient enhancement achieved by the coatings was 1.21-1.74 times that of the plain Cu plate. The one-layer coating with 15 vol.% CNT exhibited the best boiling heat transfer performance in terms of lowering the superheat and enhancing the heat transfer coefficient. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available