4.7 Article

Theoretical studies of arsenite adsorption and its oxidation mechanism on a perfect TiO2 anatase (1 0 1) surface

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 258, Issue 3, Pages 1192-1198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.069

Keywords

Arsenite; TiO2; Density functional theory; Adsorption; Absorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20773013, 20703021, 20803014]
  2. 211 funding program of Guangdong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are many areas in the world where the ground water has been contaminated by arsenic. TiO2 is one of the most promising materials that can remove arsenic from groundwater supplies by the adsorption-based processes. The TiO2 surface is capable of photo-catalytic oxidation (PCO) changing the arsenite [As(III)] to arsenate [As(V)] which is more easily absorbed by the surface, increasing the efficiency of the process. In this paper, a density functional theory calculation has been performed to investigate the adsorption of As(III) on a perfect TiO2 anatase (1 0 1) surface. All the As(III) solution species such as H3AsO3, H2AsO3-, HAsO32- and AsO33- are put onto the surface with many different possible attitudes to obtain the adsorption energy. Based on the adsorption energy and the concentration of H3AsO3, H2AsO3-, HAsO32- and AsO33- in an aqueous solution, the bidentate binuclear (BB) adsorption configurations of H2AsO3- on the surface are more favorable at low As(III) concentrations, whereas BB form and monodentate mononuclear (MM) form may coexist at higher concentrations. By calculating H2AsO3- co-adsorption with water and oxygen, we can confirm the deep acceptor character of an adsorbed O-2 molecule which implies that surface superoxide (or hydroperoxyl radical) plays an important role during the PCO process of As(III) on TiO2 surface. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available