4.1 Article

Health Care Providers' Perspectives of Providing Culturally Competent Care in the NICU

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12524

Keywords

culture/cultural competence; grounded theory; health care professionals; immigrants/migrants; NICU; relationships; patient-provider

Funding

  1. Neonatal Research Fund, Northern Alberta Neonatal Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the experiences and perceptions of health care providers caring for new immigrant families in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Design: Qualitative design using grounded theory methodology. Setting: Two tertiary-level NICUs of two large metropolitan hospitals in western Canada. Participants: Fifty eight (58) health care providers from multiple disciplines. Methods: Health care providers were interviewed during seven focus groups. We recorded and transcribed focus group data. We analyzed transcripts via line-by-line coding, categorization of codes, concept saturation, and theme generation assisted through NVIVO software. Results: Health care providers identified the nuanced construct of fragile interactions that is embedded within care of the new immigrant family in the NICU. During crisis, decision making, differing norms and beliefs, and language and communication are barriers that affected the fragile nature of interactions. During transition home, fragile interactions were affected by unintentional stereotyping, limited time for intangible activities, and lack of intuitive perceptions of the needs of new immigrant families. Health care providers employed caring and culturally competent strategies to overcome the fragile nature of interactions. Conclusion: Within the premise of providing family-centered care is the concept of honoring cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity; it is imperative that culturally competent care be considered and implemented as a separate stand-alone aspect when caring for new immigrant families.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available