4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

One-pot hydrothermal synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical properties of rGO/MnFe2O4 nanocomposites

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.7567/JJAP.54.06FH10

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD/0281/2552]
  2. Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), NSTDA, Ministry of Science and Technology, Thailand, through its program of Center of Excellence Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a simple facile route for preparing an rGO/MnFe2O4 nanocomposite through a one-pot hydrothermal approach was demonstrated. Graphite oxide (GO) was prepared from graphite powder by a modified Hummers method. Fe(NO3)(2)center dot 9H(2)O and Mn(NO3)(2)center dot H2O were used as the precursors for the preparation of the rGO/MnFe2O4 nanocomposite. The formation of the rGO/MnFe2O4 nanocomposite was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Rama spectroscopy (Raman). The specific surface area of the prepared composite obtained by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis was lower than that of pure rGO but higher than that of pure MnFe2O4. Consequently, the electrochemical performance was investigated by using a three-electrode cell system in 6.0M KOH. The results show that the specific capacitance was determined to be 190.3, 276.9, and 144.5 F/g at a scan rate of 10mV/s, and 194.9, 274.6, and 134.4 F/g at a current density of 5.0A/g for rGO, rGO/(5mmol) MnFe2O4, and rGO/(10 mmol) MnFe2O4, respectively. These results suggest that the composite of MnFe2O4 nanoparticles on an rGO nanosheet can improve the capacitive behavior of the fabricated electrode, but the electrochemical properties are reduced when the MnFe2O4 concentration ratio is high. (C) 2015 The Japan Society of Applied Physics

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available