4.7 Article

A new method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to group decision making

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 1563-1582

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.09.002

Keywords

Fuzzy numbers; Fuzzy probabilistic preference relation; Ranking; Group decision making

Funding

  1. USM fellowship
  2. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [6711229, 6711195]
  3. National Nature Science Fund Project NSFCs [61170040, 11171086]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [F2013201060, A2013201119]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Education Department of Hebei Province [ZD20131028]
  6. Foundation of Hebei University [3504020]
  7. 100-Talent Programme of Hebei [CPRC002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a new method for comparing fuzzy numbers based on a fuzzy probabilistic preference relation is introduced. The ranking order of fuzzy numbers with the weighted confidence level is derived from the pairwise comparison matrix based on 0.5-transitivity of the fuzzy probabilistic preference relation. The main difference between the proposed method and existing ones is that the comparison result between two fuzzy numbers is expressed as a fuzzy set instead of a crisp one. As such, the ranking order of n fuzzy numbers provides more information on the uncertainty level of the comparison. Illustrated by comparative examples, the proposed method overcomes certain unreasonable (due to the violation of the inequality properties) and indiscriminative problems exhibited by some existing methods. More importantly, the proposed method is able to provide decision makers with the probability of making errors when a crisp ranking order is obtained. The proposed method is also able to provide a probability-based explanation for conflicts among the comparison results provided by some existing methods using a proper ranking order, which ensures that ties of alternatives can be broken. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available