4.7 Article

A modified multi-criterion optimization genetic algorithm for order distribution in collaborative supply chain

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 37, Issue 14-15, Pages 7855-7864

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.05.021

Keywords

Collaborative supply chain; Order distribution; GA; AHP; TOPSIS

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (for Distinguished Young Scholars) [CSCT2010BA2003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61174022]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA013801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supply chain collaboration is prevalent in today's business model, and has been recognized to be one of the important issues in improving competition strength. Order distribution is to determine which order should be allocated to which supplier, it plays a very important role in a collaborative supply chain, because different order distribution infers different benefit under different criteria. However, there is not much research on the order distribution methodology. This paper adopted a framework of a central coordination system, which is equipped with a multi-criteria genetic optimization feature. In the previous multi-criterion optimization genetic algorithm (MCOGA), the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is deployed to evaluate the fitness values. In this paper, a modified MCOGA is proposed based on the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). There are two main parts, namely, searching and evaluation, in genetic algorithms. Compared with the MCOGA, the proposed method takes the advantage of less complexity in the evaluation stage. The numerical example of order distribution is used to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available