4.5 Article

Investigating the complex interface where bedrock transforms to regolith

Journal

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages S12-S15

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER15675]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [EAR 0722476, EAR-0725019]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-05ER15675] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0722476, 0725019] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interface where bedrock transforms to regolith is not planar but rather has a roughness that varies with the scale of observation. The complexity of this surface is manifested in both element-depth and fragment size-depth distributions and may sometimes be related to the longitudinal profiles of watershed streams. The fractal nature of the bedrock-regolith interface means that the interface has a thickness which is >20 m in two ridgetop examples from Pennsylvania and Puerto Rico. Such weathering thicknesses, modeled as a function of one-dimensional fluid flow, are affected by the balance between rates of weathering and erosion. One-dimensional models are consistent with weathering advance rates that vary with equilibrium solubility and porefluid velocities (and not reaction kinetics). However, fluid flow is not strictly downward and one-dimensional. Permeability of regolith changes as particle size and bulk density changes with depth. Thus, both downward and lateral flow occurs especially at reaction fronts where reactions change permeability. The rate of weathering advance is, therefore, affected by the 3-dimensional distribution of reaction zones that affect permeability across the watershed. Quantitative models of such phenomena over a range of spatial and temporal scales are needed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available