4.5 Article

Major ion and isotope geochemistry of fluids and gases from coalbed methane and shallow groundwater wells in Alberta, Canada

Journal

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 1307-1329

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.06.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alberta Ingenuity Center for Water Research, Alberta Environment
  2. Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada (PTAC) through ERAC
  3. Enerplus Resource Fund
  4. Nexen Inc., Burlington Resources
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of coalbed methane (CBM) represents a vital new source of natural gas supply in Western Canada. There are, however, concerns over potential negative environmental impacts on shallow groundwater resources in the hypothetical case that leakage of fluids and gases from CBM operations occurs. This paper compares major ion and isotope geochemistry data for produced fluids or gases from two major coal deposits in Western Canada (Mannville Formation and the Horseshoe Canyon/Belly River Group) with similar data collected for shallow groundwater in south-central Alberta. The objective was to generate comprehensive baseline geochemical data to determine the key geochemical characteristics and differences of produced fluids and gases from two coal deposits and shallow groundwater in Alberta and to find parameters that are suitable for identifying potential leakage of fluids or gases into shallow groundwater. Shallow groundwater had average total dissolved solids (TDS) of 1037 mg/L Most samples belonged to the Na-HCO3-SO4 water type and average SO42- concentrations were 185 mg/L The Horseshoe Canyon/Belly River Group swabbing fluids had average TDS of 5427 mg/L, a Na-HCO3 water type, and average SO42- concentrations of 47.7 mg/L. The produced fluids from the Mannville Formation had average TDS contents of 74,500 mg/L, negligible SO42- and a Na-Cl water type. Shallow groundwater and produced fluids from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation and the Mannville group had distinct delta H-2 and delta O-18 values and plotting delta O-18 values versus total dissolved solids was found to be an effective approach to distinguish the waters. Sulfur isotope data revealed the occurrence of bacterial (dissimilatory) SO4 reduction in some shallow groundwater samples and in the produced fluids from the Horseshoe Canyon/Belly River Group. Methane was found in several shallow groundwater samples and its average delta C-13 (-72.1 +/- 6.8 parts per thousand) and delta H-2 values (-297 +/- 17 parts per thousand) indicated a biogenic origin predominantly from CO2 reduction. Dissolved gases from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation fluids with average delta C-13 values of methane of -54.0 +/- 4.1 parts per thousand, and ethane of -36.5 +/- 2.4 parts per thousand and traces of higher alkanes suggest a mixture of predominantly biogenic and some thermogenic gas. Dissolved hydrocarbon gas from the Mannville Formation had the highest average delta C-13 values of -49.4 +/- 3.6 parts per thousand for methane, -28.8 +/- 2.1 parts per thousand for ethane and -26.9 +/- 1.1 parts per thousand for propane. The presence of higher alkanes suggests that the Mannville produced fluids contain an appreciable thermogenic gas component. The biogenic gas component in the Horseshoe Canyon and the Mannville Formation was mainly formed via acetate fermentation according to alpha(CO2-CH4) values between 1.02 and 1.07. It is concluded that delta O-18 values of the fluids in concert with total dissolved solids, and the isotopic compositions of methane and ethane are sufficiently distinct in shallow groundwater and produced fluids from the Horseshoe Canyon and the Mannville Formations that they may serve as tracers for evaluating potential contamination of shallow groundwater with produced fluids or gases. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available